The justification of love in a midsummer nights dream by william shakespeare

Theseus is upset because time is moving so slowly, but Hippolyta assures him the four days will quickly pass. Their relationship has not always been so loving. Theseus won Hippolyta during a battle. While they discuss their relationship, Egeus enters with his daughter, Hermia, and her two suitors, Lysander and Demetrius.

The justification of love in a midsummer nights dream by william shakespeare

SparkNotes: A Midsummer Night’s Dream: Themes

Shakespeare Love Deception Elizabethan Plays A Midsummer Night's Dream Twelfth Night Although he is arguably best known for his tragedies exploring emotions associated with familial obligations, the need for revenge, and overwhelming ambition, English poet and playwright William Shakespeare penned numerous lines of verse and multiple manuscripts of dramatic works concerning the equally puzzling and dangerous human experience surrounding the feeling of love.

By focusing solely on this branch of love, Shakespeare is able to incorporate a plethora of illustrations throughout both his comedies and sonnets of parental love, sibling love, romantic love, and variations on the classical idea of phileo, or friendship love, while excluding such unrelated phenomena of affection as the love of material goods or the love of a particular season.

With deception present in nearly every relationship addressed in its respective play, these two comedic works are able to serve as a sort of rubric for understanding love as it is presented by Shakespeare.

When examined together, these plays undoubtedly depict deception as an integral factor in the formation of both platonic and romantic relationships capable of simultaneously manipulating reality and revealing hidden truth. The overwhelming presence of both deliberate and unintentional deceit combined in these two dramas can be easily viewed as evidencing the inherently deceptive nature of love.

The most efficient method of distinguishing the different forms of deception Shakespeare addresses in his comedies is on the basis of the deceptive agent.

Categorizing the numerous instances of dishonesty in this manner makes it profoundly easier to identify similar occurrences across the two dramas based solely on the source of the trickery and the response of the victim. In both of the primary categories there are moments of purposefully malicious deception with the intent to cause embarrassment or discomfort, as well as either inadvertent or well-intentioned acts of trickery designed to improve the fortunes of the deceived.

Related Questions

Each documented moment of deception, regardless of how it would potentially be classified, serves to reinforce the assertion that the nature of love espoused in Shakespearean comedies is intrinsically misleading and illusory. Looking first at deception brought on by others, one recurring reason for the employment of this brand of deceit is to create the appearance of equality between the lover and their intended beloved.

In doing so, the pursuing lover actively deceives the unknowing beloved in order to make their relationship more plausible. Deception of this variety is most prevalent in the relationship with Duke Orsino forged by Viola throughout the course of Twelfth Night.

When she is first introduced into the action of this play, Viola has just been pulled ashore by a nameless captain in Illyria and believes her twin brother, Sebastian, to have drowned in the wreckage of their ship.

Although it is not until later in the play that Viola admits her romantic feelings for Orsino, it is this initial act of deception that affords her the ability to engage in the sort of unrestrained and honest relationship possible between men of near-equal standing that would have otherwise alluded her because she is, by virtue of being a woman, considered to be subordinate to her powerful, male beloved.

As essayist Anne Schotter points out, the anonymously authored medieval Latin poem Pamphilus opens with the protagonist detailing his love for Galathea to Venus, the goddess of love. While this form of force does not necessarily inflict direct physical harm to the deceived party, as Shakespeare demonstrates, it is nonetheless problematic and destructive.

Serving as a steward to Lady Olivia, Malvolio is forced to constantly interact with and tolerate her rowdy and ever-intoxicated uncle, Sir Toby, his young but equally disruptive companion, Sir Andrew, and his vengeful, enabling fellow servant, Maria, all of whom constantly force Malvolio to reprimand their unsavory behavior on behalf of Olivia.

Like the many forms of deception brought about at the hands of outside agents showcased in these plays, Shakespeare also highlights for readers the several varying means of self-deception associated with the existence of love. Given the overwhelming presence of dishonesty and trickery befalling these characters at the hands of their contemporaries, it may seem odd and troublesome for lovers to willingly and knowingly deceive themselves; however, there is an unavoidable psychological basis for this puzzling phenomenon.

The activation of these highly imaginative modes of thinking make the lover both susceptible to and capable of misleading himself. One of the most prevalent forms of self-deception Shakespeare uses in his plays is the idealization of the beloved.

In this occurrence, the lover is either so desperate to attain his elusive beloved or so overcome with emotion at having received confirmation that his feelings are reciprocated, that he is rendered unable to honestly and unbiasedly judge her value and merit.

Duke Orsino is certainly guilty of this sort of hyperbolic overestimation in Twelfth Night. Arguably the master of self-deception, Duke Orsino also falls into this grouping. Unbeknownst to Orsino, his newfound intermediary is not the trustworthy Cesario, but Viola, a deceptive young woman who has developed her own amorous feelings for him.

The justification of love in a midsummer nights dream by william shakespeare

How durable are these relationships conceived in or nurtured by deceit? With nearly every relationship containing some form of deception it would seem impossible for the characters to form intimate and long-lasting relationships, but this is not the case.

The justification of love in a midsummer nights dream by william shakespeare

Under the protection of their created fiction, both the deceiver and the deceived have the freedom to be more honest and vulnerable since they do not have to worry about observing societal practices or keeping up appearances.

Within this space, they are also afforded the freedom necessary for introspective meditation, allowing the deceptive participants to learn more about themselves thanks to their trickery. In fact, it is the combination of all these deceptive agents that allows for the most truth to be known. Although Demetrius remains under the influence of the love-inducing flower, his speech to Duke Theseus upon being found sleeping in the forest contains a level of legitimacy and insight that cannot reasonably be solely the result of the fairy magic 4.

As Shakespeare demonstrates with Demetrius, it is only after being exposed to the life-altering deception of the mythical flower that the young lover is able to find truth by rediscovering long-repressed emotions and arriving at his epiphany of improved self-awareness.

Although it is easy to discount the relationships tainted by deception by labeling them as false or temporary, such judgements are proven to be misguided after examining the various reasons for employing deception in romantic dealings.

Whether it be the deception brought on by an outside force or the deception man places upon himself, each form plays an invaluable role in creating the necessary and ideal conditions required for love to take root and flourish.

References Cox, John D. The Evolution of Love. Freeman and Company, Shakespeare and the Nature of Love: Literature, CultureEvolution.Crime and Punishment (Pre-reform Russian: Преступленіе и наказаніе; post-reform Russian: Преступление и наказание, tr.

Prestupléniye i nakazániye, IPA: [prʲɪstʊˈplʲenʲɪje ɪ nəkɐˈzanʲɪje]) is a novel by the Russian author Fyodor was first published in the literary journal The Russian Messenger in twelve monthly.

The Moral Myopia trope as used in popular culture. A trope whereby some in-universe group moral standard is portrayed as being hypocritical because the .

Expert Answers

Get an answer for 'Please comment on the comic elements in the TITANIA-BOTTOM love affair/episode in Act blog-mmorpg.compeare's "A Midsummer Night's Dream"' and find homework help for other A . A Midsummer Night’s Dream depicts the lunacy in love by warping tensions and the dream-like quality of love beneath the eyes of the dreamer to produce “rare visions” in which to learn from.

The title of the play holds tremendous weight, as it depicts the passions of love through dreams, while emphasizing the relationship between the two.

The moon is symbolic and takes on many meanings in “A Midsummer Night’s Dream” by William Shakespeare. As this essay on symbols in “A Midsummer Night’s Dream” seeks to point out, it is not simply part of the background of the play, it symbolizes love, lust, and dreaming and is seen as a powerful symbolic force that determines and affects human behavior and reactions.

Other editors such as A. W. Verity continue to produce school editions of Shakespeare with such sections removed or altered.

Russell T Davies - Wikipedia